In this way, the time-paths overlap, and the future of one is able to affect the past of another.
"The existence of three apparent minority reports suggests the possibility of three future time paths, all existing simultaneously, any of which an individual could choose to follow or be sent along following an enticement (as in Anderton's being told he was going to murder an unknown man). A protagonist may find himself living out another person's dream, or he may enter a drug-induced state that actually makes better sense than the real world, or he may cross into a different universe completely." The ground is liable to shift under your feet. "All of his work starts with the basic assumption that there cannot be one, single, objective reality," writes science fiction author Charles Platt. His stories often become surreal fantasies as the main characters slowly discover that their everyday world is actually an illusion constructed by powerful external entities (such as in Ubik), vast political conspiracies, or simply from the vicissitudes of an unreliable narrator. This is the best explanation I can find - And it hints that even Philip Dick wasn't all that convinced of the outcome.Īnd I quote: "Dick's stories typically focus on the fragile nature of what is "real" and the construction of personal identity. He makes love to a pretty girl named Claire.
And if possible what were the latter two thinking of by putting in lines like: Dick, or the script writers, Scott Frank and Jon Cohen.
Call me crazy but what I'm trying to find out is the actual story running in the minds of the original writer, Philip K. My task is made harder by the fact that the script version has been heavily altered from the book version. I have "wade" through most of the script and can't find anything conclusive. "lost his son"? I hardly consider that as a conclusive statement that Sean is dead. So there is still nothing definitive about Sean in everything to do with Crow. We all know that "the man (Crow) who kidnapped and murdered his son" is only a pretext to frame John.
0 kommentar(er)
